Most often than not, leadership does not necessarily arise from a position, the position, however, advances leadership.
It seems to me that almost all the leaders we admire, whose stories we love to hear and tell, whose biographies and autobiographies have graced our bookshelves, have been people who have seen a need and rose to the challenge, to meet that need. It is this rising to the challenge – their leadership – that pushed them to a position, which we have come to recognize as their leadership position; it was never the other way round.
I am not talking about people who are born to find leadership positions waiting for them; leaders like queens and kings, I am talking about ordinary people who rose to be great leaders in their generation. I am talking about leaders like Mother Teresa, William Wilberforce, Festo Kivengere, Mirtin Luther King Jr., Billy Graham, Nelson Mandela, I am sure you can add to this list. These leaders did not rise to greatness because of their position prior to their leadership influence but rather, their leadership influence pushed each one of them to a position that advanced their leadership. It is what they did – their response to the needs of their time – that pushed them to the positions/levels of greatness that we have come to associate them with.
We can all agree that a leadership position is critical in order for certain objectives to be advanced and achieved. There are certain things that can only be achieved when a leader is in a particular leadership position no matter his influence prior to the position. However, as was the case in the examples mentioned above, and in many other cases we have encountered, people offer leadership positions to those who are already serving the needs to which the position is required, with the hope that the position will advance what they had already begun to do.
Whether one believes his teachings or not, Jesus Christ was spot on when he said that, “the greatest among you is the one who serves” (Luke 22:26). Servant Leadership, which is increasingly becoming popular in leadership and management studies, (go here for more on Servant Leadership), is about ignoring or even forgetting our positions, to serve/respond to the needs around us. The needs that surround us, which need our response, are service opportunities.
It is interesting to note that every time someone genuinely rises to meet a need, without any vested interests, people offer him the position and gift of leadership. I call leadership a gift because it is given by those who follow. It is given by those who accept to be moved by the leader’ influence towards the direction and, or goals he has set for them.
It should be noted also, that those who seek position for their own self interests have learnt the trick. They know how to deceive their ‘victims’ – the would be followers – in the short term. The only difference is that they do not last long before their true colors show. However, they never rise to true greatness like true servant leaders do. They may succeed in getting the position but that is all they get. They are soon forgotten when the position is no more. On the contrary, we still talk about and follow great leaders long after they have moved from their positions.
Does leadership arise from a position or does a position advance already existing leadership? Tell me what you think; leave a comment in the comments’ section bellow.

Aruho Tinka
June 17, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Nick, I must say am impressed by your blog.
No wonder all this time you went into “hiding”, something was cooking in the kitchen.
I salute you and pray for your sailing above the highest storm. Accorded time, i will once and again be coming in with academic insights on leadership and organisations.
Bravo.
Nicholas
June 18, 2012 at 9:14 PM
Tinka, thank you for your gracious comments. I will be waiting to hear your insights on the subject; I am sure they will spice the discussions.
Eddie
June 17, 2012 at 12:41 PM
It’s true Leadership is not positional. We have seen many people in those extremely “big” positions but with no influence and make it worse no one talks about them even after they leave. A true leader with influence can’t wait for a position to lead but rather he leads on matter the position. The position will only find him.
Thank you uncle for this great article.
Nicholas
June 18, 2012 at 9:20 PM
Eddie, make no mistake; sometimes you need a position in order to achieve certain objectives. For instance, you may not propose a certain bill/law unless you are a Member of Parliament, however, most often than not, those who take up positions have already been leading in one way or the other. Repost the link, I would like to hear what your friends think.
Brenda
June 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM
Great work on the subject,Nicholas! I would like to agree with Eddie on the issue of influence.Infact, I am tempted to say leadership is 99% influence. Great and renowned world leaders that we admire did not require positions. Mother Theresa forexample, is not remembered for the position she held. We remember her for her values,passion, humility sacrifice,service.I say no matter where you stand, if you are able to influence;people will follow you. In my career, i have seen what influence does..people are often willing to follow those who know their way. Position is important but i say influence is all.
I believe with influence, you can nudge even the bill proposers into a better direction.
Nicholas
June 19, 2012 at 9:13 PM
Absolutely Brenda, “Leadership is influence” as John C. Maxwell and others have argued. That should encourage everybody to lead wherever they are without waiting for positions. Some of the leaders of great influence that I have come to know are mothers. We must not, however, throw away what you have quantified as 1% – I personally would give it slightly more – of position that is needed to multiply ones influence. Sometime a leader needs a certain position, to give him the advantage that he needs, to achieve even greater influence. Position advances leadership. Note that the position advances what is already there, it may not necessarily create what is not there.
Brenda
July 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM
Very well said, Nicholas! I think it is up to us, leaders in our different capacities to deliberately strengthen our abilty to influence the people around us.I like how Dale Carnegie handles the topic in his book, “how to win friends and influence people”. He notes and i agree that to be able to influence someone, you have to be genuinely interested in them, listen to them, get to know them. This is hardwork that most leaders do not want to invest in.To be influencial, you to be very selfless and that is quite hard for many.
Christopher Acar
August 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Nicholas, this is a great piece of work that provides an equal challange to the old adage that ”Leaders are born and not made”.Through the generations ,it has been proven that having been born in a royal family does not necessarily make one a good leader.Leaders come from God and not from royal families.
Nicholas
August 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM
Chris, thank you for enriching this discussion. Your thoughts are very enlightening.
Dennis Wandera
August 27, 2012 at 6:30 PM
When all is said and done, in my opinion i have come to believe one thing about this glaring topic of LEADERSHIP, that If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader….. simple
Nicholas
August 29, 2012 at 4:38 PM
Dennis, I love your opinion. You have contributed to the hundreds of definitions of who a leader is. Thank you for sharing.